🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a misguided view of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "woke" policies represent an existential risk to the continent's identity. However, this argument rests on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger confronting the EU is not cultural but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Economic Divide Between the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark contrast. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Innovation Deficit: The Core Problem

This widening disparity stems from superior productivity growth in the United States, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at more than $10bn, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is Europe stand? Experts widely agree it is essentially a contest between two involving the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Innovation Gap

A number of major reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided rules hinder European business. A American entrepreneur can introduce a service under one set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a bigger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

In spite of these hurdles, one can find causes for hope. European leaders are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have started to propose serious reform. Key analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the necessity of major changes.

With the right incentives and rule changes, these assets might enable much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses considerable strengths: skilled workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing next-generation tech, it can still significantly boost productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.